‘History and the state: supporting institutional memory or challenging national myths? 

Should historians talk to government? Professor of British and Commonwealth history, Philip Murphy, introduces the tensions underlying the relationship between historians and politicians.

As an academic discipline, history can be thought of as something between a game and a work of art. Imagined as a game, each historical argument represents a move, challenging other players to respond with moves of their own. The validity of any move depends on adherence to a set of professionally recognised rules, largely governing the treatment and presentation of evidence.

This notion of history stresses the provisional nature of any conclusion and the essentially collective character of the historical enterprise. Yet we can also think of history as an art form. We admire something like Keith Thomas’s Religion and Decline of Magic not because we imagine it to be definitive but because the central thesis is so intellectually satisfying. It is, in a sense, ‘beautiful’ in the same way a work of art or a piece of music can be beautiful.

The long read

‘History and Policy’ and the communication challenge

Cambridge academic Professor Simon Szreter on two decades of the pioneering network for historians

Why would professional historians not want their knowledge and expertise to be understood by policymakers, politicians and advisers? Why would any of the latter want to live and make their decisions in ignorance of history?

Historians research and teach all aspects of how our nations and how other nations – and their various communities – have come to understand their mutual political and cultural relationships in the world today. Historians also study how our economies, sciences and environments have changed so dramatically over time and come to be in the problematic shape that we find them today. This is all extremely valuable knowledge, much of it every bit as relevant for those involved in public policymaking as the ideas, theories, models and findings of economists, psychologists, medical and epidemiological scientists, sociologists, anthropologists or even psephologists.

Read more

Popular now

Latest Articles
Featured Articles
Reflections on a Residency

Reflections on a Residency

By Sue Horth, IHR Practitioner in Residence, 2022 In April 2022 I was given the enormous privilege of joining the Institute of Historical Research as its first practitioner in residence, and for the last four months I’ve experienced joy and renewal as part of the...

High Noon for the Cowboy Historians

High Noon for the Cowboy Historians

By Professor Philip Murphy, Director of History & Policy Intellectually, we are all aware of the pitfalls of using history to guide policy and political strategy. The past doesn’t repeat itself and historians thrive on dispute and debate, making it almost...

Why History Matters

Why History Matters

Professor Claire Langhamer, Director of the IHR History today is challenging, complex, and creative; it is collaborative, energetic and purposeful. In a world that stumbles from crisis to crisis, historical analysis is more critical than ever before. Only by...

New Approaches to the ‘Local’

New Approaches to the ‘Local’

By Professor Catherine Clarke, Director of the IHR’s Centre for the History of People, Place and Community Understanding our places – their past, present and possible futures – has never been more firmly on the political agenda than today. The so-called ‘Place Agenda’...

School of Advanced Study

The Talking Humanities blog is curated by the School of Advanced Study, University of London.