Humanities in flux: strategies and tools for success

This edition of Talking Humanities reflects on how the humanities are changing and the future of the discipline over the next decade.

We have perspectives from the UK, Ireland and the US, including a case study of how digital is changing the future of humanities research.

What is consistent across the contributions is the turbulence of the changes currently taking place – and how they yield fresh and innovative opportunities to enrich and strengthen these subjects and practices at the heart of what it is to be human in an ever-changing world.

In our ‘long read’ article, ‘Permeable worlds and territoriality’, Ludmilla Jordanova, emeritus professor of history and visual culture at Durham, explores the flexibility and fluidity of the boundaries that define the humanities.

Rather than being limited by them and ‘tut-tutting’ about change, practitioners should exploit them to extend their practice and build new, productive relationships with partners. ‘This is not about unrealistic, polymathic utopianism,’ she writes. ‘It is about perfectly feasible possibilities for enhancing practices’

 

 

The long read

Permeable worlds and territoriality’

By Ludmilla Jordanova, emeritus professor of history and visual culture at Durham University

One of the costs of professionalisation is the erection of boundaries. Sometimes these are necessarily rigid – everyone knows something about health, some people know a great deal, but the barriers to formal medical qualifications are elaborate and high. Perhaps it is because so many people think they are experts in history and literature that academic practitioners defensively stress forms of training and disciplinary standards, which exist alongside ever-proliferating niche journals and organisations that champion a relatively small area or even the study of a single individual.

These trends are understandable. They manifest themselves when departments discuss their priorities for future posts, and colleagues assert the needs of what is imagined as a patch in need of protection. These forms of concern express not just anxiety about the value – perceived or otherwise – of specific specialisms, but a recognition that those in humanities departments find it so much harder to make a compelling public case for what they do than scientists, for example.

Read more

Popular now

Latest Articles
Featured Articles
An Introduction to the Idea of 4E Humanities

An Introduction to the Idea of 4E Humanities

We can do better in providing a clear conception of projects in the humanities By Professor Barry C Smith It is often said by funders keen to encourage more successful applications from the humanities that they wish to see bold and ambitious proposals. Too often in...

Experience and the Humanities

Experience and the Humanities

The broad field of arts and humanities still possesses this capacity to take us away from what is known By Professor Ruth Livesey It would be exaggerating to say rereading a novel by Anthony Trollope saved my professional life in summer 2021. But there was a moment of...

Ethical Issues and Experimental Humanities

Ethical Issues and Experimental Humanities

Ethical issues are at the forefront of experimental humanities. By Professor Ophelia Deroy Maja is cruising in a new self-driving car. In the back is her baby son, singing and giggling. An overhead, electric cable has fallen on the side of the road, and the car will...

An introduction to Ethical Humanities

An introduction to Ethical Humanities

How should vaccines be distributed between countries? By Professor Jo Wolff A funny thing happened around March 2020. Anyone who had worked on the ethics of healthcare resource allocation, bioethics, or global health ethics was suddenly treated as a holder of...

School of Advanced Study

The Talking Humanities blog is curated by the School of Advanced Study, University of London.